🍔Market Breaks Down - Sell Signal

3 tactical short trade ideas

Welcome back to MktContext. We study the US economy and time the stock market.

Stocks suffered another week of losses, and for the first time we saw sustained selling pressure. Several major indices entered correction territory (-10% from highs).

We have been wrong in our assessment of the Iran war outcome, and the conflict is rapidly evolving into something more prolonged and dangerous. The market is starting to price the risk of recession.

In times like these, we think it prudent to manage risk by reducing exposure to stocks. That is exactly what we did this week.

Today’s topics: Iran negotiations and potential escalation, impact on markets, tech selloff, portfolio changes and 3 trade ideas.

Negotiations begin

The fourth week of the war saw a shift from open confrontation to potential diplomacy. On Monday, Trump announced he would delay destroying power plants by 5 days (not other sites though, those continue to be bombed) and concurrently start negotiations with Iran.

Iran publicly denied negotiations are happening, but this is just a guise meant to maintain regime legitimacy and keep hardliners happy. There is evidence that dialogue is indeed happening, as it is mediated by officials from Oman, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, and Pakistan.

The question now is whether the two sides can meet in the middle. The US released a list of 15 demands that includes nuclear and missile disarmament. For that reason alone, the demands will be unacceptable to Iran. And as these talks are happening, the US and Israel continue to strike industrial/weapons facilities, which frankly damages US’ credibility for any serious settlement.

Iran’s security doctrine is based on using proxy groups, missiles, and nukes as a strategic deterrent against the US and Israel. Nuclear development is a symbol of national sovereignty that they have invested heavily to sustain. Accepting disarmament would be a huge strategic risk, akin to acknowledging permanent defeat.

So Iran countered with its own 5 demands centered around security guarantees, reparations, and full sovereignty over Hormuz. We predict this will be unacceptable to Trump as he hopes to control oil flow in the region going forward.

The negotiations are a good start, and demonstrate that both sides want an offramp. However, given two unwavering positions, these talks are likely a non-starter. Therefore, the war must enter the next stage of escalation — precisely what the markets started to price in this week.

To see our trades and portfolio, consider upgrading to paid subscriber status.

More escalation

If talks fail, the US/Israel likely ratchet up pressure with more hits on energy infrastructure, hits on civilian infrastructure (water de-salination plants, power plants, etc.), and a ground invasion. Iran will retaliate commensurately.

Saudi Arabia and UAE are considering entering the war, as are Western allies (UK, France, Germany) who have had their remote bases struck. This may sound like World War, but in reality it is World vs. Iran. Iran’s military capabilities are severely eroded, and no major power has been willing to stand alongside them — not even Russia or China.

On the ground, the US has two possible choices: a full-scale invasion, or calibrated incursions. The US is unlikely to go full-scale at this time because of the huge costs of prolonged and attritional combat. The US has taken several weeks just to bring 10K soldiers to the region, whereas Iran is ready to defend with ~1M soldiers. After all this, Trump is against ground invasion and still has political constraints.

The more likely course of action is calibrated military escalation. This means tactical incursions or seizures of high-value strongholds. For example, Kharg Island (Iran’s oil terminal and financial lifeline), seizing Iranian oil tankers, or forcefully re-opening Hormuz.

But this won’t end the war. It just results in an unending cycle of confrontation and negotiation. As long as no progress is made, Iran will consider this a “win” and continue fighting forever. The regime survives, the region is mired in prolonged conflict, Hormuz remains closed, oil prices stay high, and the world verges on recession.

Even though Iran’s military is vastly overpowered, they have some tricks. The regime employs mosaic defense and asymmetric endurance. Their strategy is built around outlasting enemies, not winning quick battles. They absorb assassinations/strikes thanks to decentralized command and underground infrastructure. They retaliate with cheap drones/missiles/proxies to bleed foes economically and politically. They drag out fights into attrition wars because they can endure longer than Western democracies.

Leaders like Khamenei have drilled “preserve the system” since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. No martyrs and no mass army charges; only endurance and measured retaliation. Fight smart, and seek secret offramps to live another day.

Ironically, Trump has a very easy exit. All he has to do is concede the Strait and fully withdraw troops. Let Iran have their missiles and nukes. But this would amount to admitting defeat which means he would never do this. And by refusing to concede in negotiations, he has talked himself into a corner, strategically speaking.

The other offramp is a phased agreement. Iran agrees to restrict portions of its nuclear program, while the US reciprocates through partial lifting of sanctions. Both sides claim strategic victories. Hormuz is reopened, but Iran receives taxes on transit. This is a pragmatic but unlikely solution, as both sides take an all-or-nothing approach.

Impact on markets…

The rest of this article is for premium members. Upgrade now to continue reading:

• Impact on markets

• Tech selloff

• Portfolio changes

• 3 trade ideas

Claim your free trial by clicking the button below!